

It becomes an exercise in setting up Layers appropriately. It's a bit slow (and tedious). I'm sure there's a more efficient method to do it, but I have not puzzled it out. Good luck!




I'm not at all sure about the legend. I wanted to convey that the countries with the greatest increase in size indicated a greater GDP. I used a divergent color scheme to further highlight which countries had higher GDP's. The size increase from the cartogram application made it easy to see which countries had higher GDP's, if I was familiar with the geography. But, a country like South Africa, whose actual shape I'm not terribly familiar with was difficult to determine at a glance.
Failed to include the number of iterations I used. It was 8.


I ended up using a dot value of 3, 1 dot is 3 houses per square mile. I used a dot size of 0.6 points, but later added a stroke of 0.2 points. I choose not to display county names, rivers, lakes, or wetlands so the dots would stand out. I found the map very busy looking with all layers displayed. Plus, I had so much fun making 2289 blue dots I just had to show them off :)