![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmOZ6ZXi_hU6BQKNuCp26FVPQlBVsFw5NQj9NFZwkLy6CzhCvGrKzXTyytwa8JU8c4X7G4Su2UphUBfLZkeG6UE1NqsBqdi0jHYdLEuw1JWYZrmJpDHBqNNzpnLAqk7B3GqeChxH0_jx8/s400/pcola_super.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-jkWtzrleP8okBFQRMJJvDjlltYTvrjPOuK7EPlvL3pc196pD9AuSFF-Ii6RUaHliamTLcR93USedCShaI83JDzLbxY7Zk5OHQyUYs3gs8lJHgbFLR06wt50JWa78yVYttx5gTxMbUC4/s400/pcola_recode.jpg)
I sometimes have a hard time differentiating one land type from another. In this case grass/agriculture land covers gave me a lot of trouble. In the Unsupervised map I took that cluster of fairly regular shapes in the north west portion to be an area of High Urban Density. I didn't even include a land cover category for agriculture because I didn't think any sizable farm land existed on the image. Part of my issue was not paying strict attention to the area I was viewing and making assumptions about the image based on past experience. I thought the main body of water running through the center of the map was Escambia Bay, hence I assumed that area in the North West portion to be Pensacola. Nope. That central water body in the image is Perdido Bay making that North West portion of the image a sparsely developed section of Alabama. Upon further review, I took those North West sections to be tracts of farm land. I added the Agriculture land cover category for the Supervised image. I still ended up with a confusing mish mash of land cover types in portions of both maps and agreement between land type categories between each map is sketchy.